Friday, November 21, 2014

Old Testament 302 Day 10

Thought: Today I come to that part of Christian morals where they differ most sharply from all other morals. There is one vice of which no man in the world is free; which everyone loathes when he sees it in someone else; and of which hardly any people, except Christians, ever imagine that they are guilty them- selves. I have heard people admit that they are bad-tempered, or that they cannot keep their heads about girls or drink, or even that they are cowards. I do not think I have ever heard anyone who was not a Christian accuse himself of this vice. And at the same time I have very seldom met anyone, who was not a Christian,

who showed the slightest mercy to it in others. There is no fault that makes a man more unpopular, and no fault which we are more unconscious of in ourselves. And the more we have it ourselves, the more we dislike it in others. The vice I am talking of is Pride or Self-Conceit: and the virtue opposite to it, in Christian morals, is called Humility. You may remember, when I was talking about sexual morality, I warned you that the centre of Christian morals did not lie there. Well, now, we have come to the centre. According to Christian teachers, the essential vice, the utmost evil, is Pride. Unchastity, anger, greed, drunkenness, and all that, are mere fleabites in comparison: it was through Pride that the devil became the devil: Pride leads to every other vice: it is the complete anti-God state of mind. Does this seem to you exaggerated? If so, think it over. I pointed out a moment ago that the more pride one had, the more one disliked pride in others. In fact, if you want to find out how proud you are the easiest way is to ask yourself, “How much do I dislike it when other people snub me, or refuse to take any notice of me, or shove their oar in, or patronize me, or show off?” The point is that each person’s pride is in competition with everyone else’s pride. (The Great Sin, C. S. Lewis, from Mere Christianity)

Books of the Week: House of Glory, S. Michael Wilcox and Feed My Sheep, Alexander B. Morrison

EZEKIEL - 601-574 - God Is Strong or God Strengthens

   "With the exception of the Savior, with his miracles, no prophet used more dramatic or unusual teaching devices than Ezekiel. A prophet of the Babylonian captivity, he by revelation kept his people informed as to the status and destiny of those still in Jerusalem." (McConkie, Gospel Symbolism p. 165-8) 26th book of the Old Testament - Ezekiel was a priest - His plans for religious organization to develop an independent ecclesiastical power within the state contributed greatly to the recovery and growth of Judaism after the exile; for this he has been called the "Father of Judaism." He belonged to the aristocracy of Jerusalem - Raised in Judah.  Taken with Jehoiachin and 10,000 others to Babylon in 597 BC or 601 BC Book of Mormon time where he served as a prophet priest in a kind of house arrest situation. When 30 years old he received his first vision? (1:1) A contemporary of Jeremiah (in Judah) and Daniel (in the Babylonian court) - For a time, the authority of the Book of Ezekiel was questioned by Jewish teachers. One objection they had was that the visions in Ch. 1 and Ch. 40-48 were too obscure. For a time Jews under 30 yrs. of age were forbidden to read these obscure passages.

One

V. 1- 30th year may have reference to Ezekiel's age?  Brother Sperry says that he thinks that this was in all probability a concentration camp, with the deported Jews furnishing the forced labor in the Babylonian irrigation system.

Vs. 2 - 4-5 yrs. After Lehi left Jerusalem and nearly 6 years before the fall of the city of Jerusalem.

"It is very difficult, if not impossible, for a mortal to convey in writing the message and spirit of a vision or other revelation from God so that the reader will have a complete understanding of what took place and what was communicated. Such was the challenge of Ezekiel in describing his transcendent visions of heaven. Others, too, have faced the same challenge (see 2 Corinthians 12:4; 3 Nephi 28:12–14; D&C 76:114–17). Joseph Smith said that “could you gaze into heaven five minutes, you would know more than you would by reading all that ever was written on the subject” (History of the Church, 6:50). One must experience revelation to understand it fully. Those, including Ezekiel, who have had visitations or visions from the eternal worlds have often used symbolism, metaphor, simile, comparisons, and other kinds of figurative language to try to convey the experience they had and the message they received (see D&C 110:2–3; JS—H 1:32; Daniel 10:5–9; Revelation 1:12–18; 12:1–6). Therefore, everything Ezekiel said need not be taken literally, for he used many figurative expressions to try to tell that which was far beyond mortal experience. Many times, for example, he used words like as, likeness, and appearance (see Ezekiel 1:4–5, 7, 10, 13–14, 16, 24, 26–28).

Vs. 4 The words wind, tempest, or storm would better fit the meaning intended in Ezekiel 1:4. A wind that revolves on its own axis with great rapidity is not what is meant by the Hebrew word translated “whirlwind”; rather, the idea of a furious or powerful wind is what was intended (see Merrill F. Unger, Unger’s Bible Dictionary, s.v. “whirlwind”). The metaphor signifies the power of God.

Cloud, Fire, Brightness, Color of Amber, Lamps, Lightning - These figures are used throughout the scriptures in association with the glory, power, and majesty of God’s presence or that of His messengers. (See “cloud” and “fire” in Exodus 13:21–22; 16:10; 19:9–16; 24:16; Leviticus 16:2; Matthew 17:5; D&C 34:7. See “fire,” “brightness,” “color of amber,” “lamps,” and “lightning” in Exodus 3:2; Hebrews 12:29; 1 Nephi 1:6; D&C 29:12; 110:2–3; 133:41; Habakkuk 3:3–4; Acts 26:13; 2 Thessalonians 2:8; JS—H 1:16–17, 30–32; Daniel 10:6.)

Vs. 5-6 Four Creatures with Four Faces - In his vision, Ezekiel saw four creatures, each of which had four faces. “They four had the face of a man, … a lion, … an ox … [and] the face of an eagle” (Ezekiel 1:10). The Apostle John had a similar vision. In his vision, the creatures were described as being “like a lion, … like a calf, … [having] a face as a man, and … like a flying eagle” (Revelation 4:7). The Prophet Joseph explained that the four beasts in John’s vision were representative of classes of beings (see D&C 77:3). The faces of the creatures in Ezekiel’s vision seem to represent the same thing. The following interpretation, from an ancient Jewish commentary, is in harmony with that view: “Man is exalted among creatures; the eagle is exalted among birds; the ox is exalted among domestic animals; the lion is exalted among wild beasts; and all of them have received dominion, and greatness has been given them, yet they are stationed below the chariot of the Holy One” (Midrash Shemoth Rabbah 23; in D. Guthrie and J. A. Motyer, eds., The New Bible Commentary: Revised, p. 667).

Vs. 8 - The Lord taught Joseph Smith that the wings of the beasts John saw in his revelation (see Revelation 4:8) “are a representation of power, to move, to act, etc.” (D&C 77:4). That interpretation also seems to apply to the creatures in Ezekiel’s vision.

Vs. 9 Their Wings Were Joined Together- The creatures of Ezekiel’s vision were in complete harmony and unity. They moved as one, symbolizing the total unity that exists among all living things who submit to God’s will.

Vs. 15-21. Because Joseph Smith received from the Lord some keys for interpreting the meaning of the beasts in John’s vision (see D&C 77:2–4), the parallels between John’s vision and Ezekiel’s give some clues to the meaning of the beasts Ezekiel saw. There is, however, no parallel in John’s vision to the wheels seen by Ezekiel. The Prophet Joseph Smith said: “I make this broad declaration, that whenever God gives a vision of an image, or beast, or figure of any kind, He always holds Himself responsible to give a revelation or interpretation of the meaning thereof, otherwise we are not responsible or accountable for our belief in it. Don’t be afraid of being damned for not knowing the meaning of a vision or figure, if God has not given a revelation or interpretation of the subject.” (TPJS p. 291.)" OTSM p. 266-7

After Ch. 1 - Ezekiel is much easier to understand

Two

What Ezekiel is being asked to do vs. 1-3, 5 and 8-10

Three

Vs. 1-4 and 17-21 - See Jacob 1:19

Four

Ezekiel does a pre-enactment of the destruction of Jerusalem

Five

Vs. 1-5 - A close shave for Ezekiel.

Vs. 10- As low as you go.

Ten

The Spirit of the Lord leaves the Jerusalem temple- See Ezek. 40 for the good news.

Eleven

Vs. 19-20- Our day

Twelve

Vs. 1-6 - Ezekiel is used by the lord as a sign of the scattering of the Jews.

Thirteen

Vs. 3 - Prophets who follow their own whims, but have seen nothing.

Seventeen

Verses 21-23 - Orson Pratt said that these verses refer to the Mulekites. Note footnote on vs. 22.

Eighteen

Read this whole chapter on accountability, repentance and Article of Faith #2.

Twenty

Vs. 12,19,20 - good on why we have the Sabbath

Vs. 49 - Ezekiel was also hard to understand by people of his own time.

Twenty-five to Thirty-two - Prophetic pronouncements on neighboring countries.

Twenty-seven

Probably the most detailed treatise on an ancient world economy that we have in the Bible.

Chapters 33-48 - deal with phases of the great restoration of Israel in the latter days.

Thirty-three

Vs. 15-16 - great repentance verses

Thirty-four

Vs.2-3 - Elder Morrison's book - "Feed My Sheep" p. 75 yellow fever needed!

Thirty-seven

Vs. 1-14- Dem bones, dem bones, dem dry bones.

16-17 - the only two verses in Ezekiel that most LDS have read- stick = a wooden tablet or sticks the scrolls were wrapped around.

Several years into the project we asked for a report. How were they progressing with the tedious, laborious listing of topics in alphabetical order? They responded, “We have been through Heaven and Hell, past Love and Lust, and now we’re working toward Repentance.” The stick or record of Judah—the Old Testament and the New Testament—and the stick or record of Ephraim—the Book of Mormon, which is another testament of Jesus Christ—are now woven together in such a way that as you pore over one you are drawn to the other; as you learn from one you are enlightened by the other. They are indeed one in our hands. Ezekiel’s prophecy now stands fulfilled. (BKP Ensign Nov. 1982)

Thirty-eight and Thirty-nine

We can summarize the confusion in naming the future battles in the following way. 1. The battle of Armageddon is before the millennial reign of Christ begins, and the battle of Gog and Magog is after the millennial reign; and 2) What Ezekiel here describes is actually the pre-millennial battle of Armageddon, though he (and he only) labels it the battle of Gog and Magog. Keeping tht one difference in mind resolves any confusion about which is which. (Ogden p. 391)

Forty to forty-eight - describe the Lord's temple in the last days and the millennial reign of Christ, as well as the land distribution of the tribes of Israel. See House of Glory Chapter six by S. Michael Wilcox.

Obadiah- Servant of Jehovah - We know almost nothing about this prophet. There are 12 men in the OT called by this name. This one appears to have been a contemporary of Jeremiah. Compare this book with Jeremiah 49:9-10, 14, 15, 16. This story deals with the conflict between Jacob and Esau. Esau=Edom=Idumea=Babylon=Worldliness.)


Vs. 3-9 - The ruins of Petra, were a whole city was carved out of rock cliffs. It could be entered only through a narrow gorge. The Edomites could protect themselves from invading enemies with great success. Many scholars think it was the capital of Idumea.

Vs. 10-15 - Reasons for Edom’s fall: violence shown against their brother Jacob, and their rejoicing at the destruction of the children of Judah in “the day of distress” (v. 12). J. R. Dummelow believed that Edom’s destruction was partly due to their assisting Nebuchadnezzar during his siege and capture of Jerusalem. Vs. 16–21- These verses have a temporal and a spiritual meaning. If Esau (Edom) represents the worldly wicked, these verses may refer to that day when Israel will be completely restored and evil eliminated. Mount Zion, a symbol for deliverance and holiness (v. 17), will be the inheritance of the “house of Jacob,” whereas the “house of Esau” will be stubble, fit only to be burned. The “house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame … and they shall kindle in them [Esau], and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau” (v. 18). Eventually, “saviors shall come up on mount Zion to judge the mount of Esau; and the kingdom shall be the Lord’s” (v. 21). (OTSM p. 259)